4 Research Perils and Prevention

Danger Ahead

4 Research Perils and Prevention

October 17, 2019

 

Research Can Take You to Shady Places
Since most of my online behavior jumps between a handful of sites (mostly writing sites), I rarely come into contact with viruses or malware of any sort. But that changes when I'm in the middle of a research project, especially when the research touches on pop culture or technology; but really, any research subject can push a writer onto a site that has been compromised by malware.

My husband would tell you that he can always tell when I'm in the middle of a research project because it really puts our protection programs to the test. Good antivirus and malware-prevention programs are a must. I want to be careful about how I spend my money, so my security programs are usually either free or relatively low cost. I can't afford to invest in security programs that cost a lot, and my computer-guy husband doesn't like those high-ticket programs anyway. A high-ticket program can make you think you’re safe and cause you to relax a little too much. But all good security requires frequent scans and constant updating. The one thing I absolutely would not do is rely on whatever security programs came with your computer. Put those research skills to the task and find the best programs to work for you and your computer. You'll be glad you did.
 
Research Must Have Parameters
Although a good researcher becomes a temporary expert in a narrowly focused subject, it's important to realize that the pool of interesting information is endless. If you allow yourself to make detours whenever you spot something interesting, you can quickly find you've put in so many hours of research that your final written book or article or short story could not possibly make enough money to pay for all that time. Now, I sometimes enjoy research for research sake (when I have the time, which isn't often). In a situation like that, I might spend a month simply exploring all the aspects of a topic. For instance, when I learned of Matthew Henson, an arctic explorer, I was fascinated by him and by the whole world of exploration in extreme conditions. The danger of that kind of exploration was eye-opening and the more I researched, the more questions I had. So the whole research experience was wonderful. It took a full month. I read books, talked to experts, and studied documents from the period. And in the end, I wrote a piece for Highlights, but that was all. It was a huge personal indulgence and not something I can do very often. I couldn't make a living that way. So I absolutely must become a temporary expert in a much shorter period of time. There are two ways to help keep your research from running away with you: planning and knowing when to stop.
 
Planning requires two steps. One is a quick skim of the topic. I read the sources that are easy to find (and thus a bit questionable). These sources are probably regurgitating information from other sources, but during the skim, I don't care. I'm just looking for the shiny thing in the midst of the stuff "everyone" knows. I skim until my inner curious kid forces me to stop because she's clamoring to know more. That's the point where I've usually found my focus, in the narrow section of a large topic. That will become my guide dog for research. I list the questions I have about this narrow focus and I dig deep.

Remember my research on Matthew Henson? Well, there were several interesting and little explored shiny things that popped up in the research. One involved a murder taking place in the arctic cold far from home. I was fascinated by that and could have easily dug deep just in that one spot, ultimately coming up with a great thriller topic, or even a lively historical mystery. Another thing that fascinated me was how little people understood about extreme exploration. Explorers received the most absurd suggestions for how to survive. Honestly, one suggestion was to build a soup pipeline to send hot soup to the men out in the vicious cold near the North Pole. The lack of understanding of the world, meant that explorers often came home and made considerable money travelling and speaking about where they went and what they saw. They would dress up and display their gear. So I found much of interest and could have gone for more in-depth focus within the larger topic of arctic exploration. Choosing these narrow, deep dive focus topics and sticking to them (as much as possible) helps tremendously in limiting the time spent researching.
 
All this research can lead you down the rabbit hole, so you need to know when to stop. Once you have chosen your narrow focus and have begun the research necessary to become an expert on that topic, how do you know when that is? Well, different researchers have different methods. One popular one is to stop when you begin finding the same information over and over and over. Another is to make periodic stops to outline an article or book from "what you know for sure so far." Then use that outline to direct your continued research. Once you have everything you need to write the book or article that you've outlined, you stop and write it. Sometimes the writing will send you back for more research to fill in holes you didn't spot before, but the outline method will help you stay on task and help limit how much time you spend.
 
Research Requires Evaluation
Research isn't simply the acquisition of information. It is also the evaluation of information. We live in an information rich world now. Well, we also live in a misinformation rich world. No matter what subject you have chosen, some of the information you will find about that subject will be suspect (or flatly wrong). The key to getting the best sources has to do with their distance from primary.

A primary source has direct access. So if you're writing about the research done on nanotechnology, a primary source would be someone doing the research. You would ask that person your questions directly. If the topic is historical, a primary source is from the person who actually experienced the event. So with the Matthew Henson example, I read letters one of the explorers wrote while he was in the arctic, and I read the journal of the leader of the expedition. The closer your source is to primary, the more valuable the information.

Of course, there is a human element even in these primary sources. Simply because you have a primary source document doesn't mean the person writing the document didn't lie or make mistakes. The letter home might have downplayed the danger. A journal might have put too much focus on the person writing it. So even primary sources require careful evaluation by the researcher and careful handling in the end result. If you built an article on letters from home, you might mention in the introduction that the letter writer might have been downplaying the danger to avoid scaring his family.

So a good writer evaluates the quality of the research (how close it to primary) and any potential bias in the source, even when it's primary. When you do both, you will stand the best chance of writing something that will sell and something that will be valuable for the reader.
 
Don't Put Research in the Corner
The last frequent research mistake is taking off your researcher hat when it comes time to sell the piece you've written. Sure, research is an important part of making your writing accurate, clear, and multi-layered, but it's also an important part of selling your writing. The skills you put into research should also be carried into hunting down markets and agents. Or into updating your information on markets and agents. Now, everyone can make a mistake and send a manuscript to a magazine that has recently stopped publishing or a book publisher that has changed their focus. If you are submitting to magazines that closed, or agents who retired, or publishers who changed focus several years ago, that does make you look bad. If you submit fiction to a nonfiction magazine, or send a manuscript that you simply identify as "a children's book," then you could be rejected without a read. If you look like someone who cannot be trusted to get facts right because you didn't do your research on the publisher, then your whole work becomes suspect.
 
Researching markets should be an ongoing process, built into your writing routine. You might not do it every day (though I do), but you should certainly schedule regular time for researching markets (and/or agents). A good market guide is important, but it’s not the only thing you need. If research is a regular part of your writing toolbox, then it makes perfect sense to use those skills to keep your market guide up to date. My market guide is full of hand-written notes gathered throughout the year to keep the information I need up-to-date. Now, I don't need to keep the whole guide updated. Many, many of the markets in the market guide don't interest me at all. They would be great for other writers, but they don't match the things I like to write, the age I like to write for, or the formats I prefer to write in.
 
So my initial "market guide" research involves going through the guide and highlighting all the markets that appeal to me because they publish things similar to what I enjoy writing (and/or write well). This much smaller collection of markets are the ones I'll keep updated through regular research. I'll check the publisher's website, but I'll also use a search engine to track down information about the publisher that was written by others. That will point me at reports by other writers (for instance, learning a market tends to require multiple invoices before they "get around" to paying you is information I need when deciding if that is a good market for me) as well as reviews of the products the publisher produces (after all, if the publisher has a poor reputation for quality, do I really want my work in there?) All of this on-going research will ultimately save me time because I won't send material to publishers who have closed or who aren't paying on a timely basis or have changed their focus to something different. Sure it costs me time to save time later, but the reason I consider that worthwhile is because I know when I have a piece in mind to sell, I'm excited and impatient. So if I wait until then to do my research, I'm going to do a rush job. That's why having good information, constantly updated, makes the submission process smoother and much more prone to success.
 
So watch these research problems and pitfalls and you'll find research becomes a tool you value above all others, because it's the tool to make you money. And don't we all like that?

Related Links

2020 Market Guides for Children's Writers

Jan Fields is a full-time, freelance author and an Institute of Children's Literature Instructor.

Would you like to have your own instructor teaching you on a one-on-one basis? Click here to let us help you write your book.

Comments

Jan Fields
October 23, 2019

Thanks, Laura. I wish I could give you an answer that made me look good, but I'll go with the truth instead. Because my research is stored on my computer, all of that I pretty much keep forever. But printed research I only keep until it gets lost in the recesses of my office and is unearthed in some future dig and tossed. I know writers who do a fantastic job of holding onto research in an organized and usable system and that's a great idea. Unfortunately, I'm not that person so if I don't use the research again fairly quickly, it gets lost.

Laurie Wilson
October 18, 2019

Much needed advice, Jan! Thank you! One question - after the article is written - do you file all your research for a future article with a different target audience and angle?

Add Comment

Sign up for our weekly tips & market leads. 

If you write for children, sign up for our ICL newsletter.

Writing for adults? Sign up for the IFW newsletter.